Compare & calibrate
21 handed-in attempts. Scores are a review aid (demo rubric), not a hiring decision.
Score distribution per dimension (1–10)
| Attempt | Problem definition | Communication | AI verification | Adaptation | Avg | Path |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noor Gupta | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2.0 | Didn't use the AI assistant · Didn't ask anyone · didn't revise |
| Chiara Takahashi | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5.5 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Farid Sørensen | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2.0 | Didn't use the AI assistant · Didn't ask anyone · revised |
| Emeka Adeyemi | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5.5 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Dmitri Chaudhry | 5 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5.3 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Leila Xu | 5 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 6.8 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 3 questions; 3 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Chiara Jaramillo | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5.8 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Aiko Bergström | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5.5 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Ines Eriksen | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5.5 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Nadia Adeyemi | 8 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 7.0 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Tamsin Whitlock | 8 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 7.3 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Gideon Varga | 7 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 7.0 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Marek Castellanos | 8 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 7.3 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Jonah Xu | 7 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 6.5 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Marek Mensah | 8 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4.8 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 1 hidden fact surfaced · revised |
| Bram Bergström | 8 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 7.0 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Jada Okonkwo | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6.5 | Used the assistant; no explicit check · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Kofi Chaudhry | 8 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 7.3 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Ximena Achterberg | 8 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 7.3 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 2 questions; 2 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Nadia Whitlock | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.3 | Repeated the assistant's claim · Asked 2 questions; 0 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Valentina Varga | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9.0 | Verified the assistant against the docs · Asked 5 questions; 4 hidden facts surfaced · revised |
| Pool median | 7 | 4 | 8 | 6 | ||
Associate Consultant · 2nd year
Sample employeeProblem definition
9
Communication
9
AI verification
9
Adaptation
9
Checked the AI's claim: yes · asked finance: yes · revised: yes
Engagement Manager · Manager
Sample employeeProblem definition
9
Communication
8
AI verification
9
Adaptation
9
Checked the AI's claim: yes · asked finance: yes · revised: yes
Side by side
Similar recommendations, different paths
took 38m 20s · bridge 0/5 · 3/5 exhibits
5.0/10
“Profit fell because of the longer Spring Sale and free shipping on online growth, plus a $4M one-off; not rent.”
Final hypothesis: none
Path
- ✓Verified the assistant against the docs
- ✓Asked 2 questions; 1 hidden fact surfaced
- ✓Revised (0 hypothesis changes, final differs from draft)
- ✓Final names the real drivers
Action sequence
Time axis shared by both cards · AI = assistant · ? = asked a person · E = exhibit · H = hypothesis · Σ = bridge · D/C = draft/challenge · ✓ = final
Key moments
Principal concern
Did not adapt: Maya's new constraints were waved off with "keep as is", the final is unchanged and unsized, and neither Helen nor Tom was ever written to.
took 35m 00s · bridge 0/5 · 3/5 exhibits
8.7/10
“Profit fell because the Spring Sale tripled and free shipping grew with online, not rent; a 4-week sale gets profit back to ~$39M.”
Final hypothesis: none
Path
- ✓Verified the assistant against the docs
- ✓Asked 5 questions; 4 hidden facts surfaced
- ✓Revised (0 hypothesis changes, final differs from draft)
- ✓Final names the real drivers
Action sequence
Time axis shared by both cards · AI = assistant · ? = asked a person · E = exhibit · H = hypothesis · Σ = bridge · D/C = draft/challenge · ✓ = final
Key moments
Principal concern
Reported ~$39M post-action profit but never stated underlying FY26 profit (~$31M) separately, which is the cleaner baseline for the board.