Noor Gupta
A-9428Their final recommendation: “asdjflksdajflk;sadjf;lasjfkl;j” · kept after Maya's challenge
Interview decision
Saving stops the review timer. A person decides; nothing is sent to the candidate automatically.
Review timer
0:00
started when you opened this review
Digest · three moments, each linked to its time in the log
Rubric · 4 dimensions · 1–10 · click for anchors and evidence
Scores backed by Keewano evidence this candidate company baseline (avg of 2 sample employees) applicant median (n = 21)Evidence from Keewano
Evidence from Keewano
Evidence from Keewano
Evidence from Keewano
Review aid (demo rubric), not a hiring decision · scored by claude-opus-5 from the action log
Beside sample employees · same case
Sample employees| Noor Gupta | Associate ConsultantSample employee · 2nd year | Engagement ManagerSample employee · Manager | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem definition | 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Communication | 1 | 9 | 8 |
| AI verification | 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Adaptation | 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Checked the AI's claim | not used | yes | yes |
| Asked the client finance analyst | no | yes | yes |
| Revised after the challenge | no | yes | yes |
| Time on the case | 1m 12s | 33m 20s | 21m 40s |
Two reference runs of the same case by sample employees, shown for context. Not a benchmark: no percentiles or predictions from two samples.
Evidence · open the exact exchange behind each claim
Clarifying question
No clarifying question to anyone before the final recommendation.
Missing from the record: nothing to open.
AI check
Didn't use the AI research assistant in this run, so there is no AI output to check.
Missing from the record: nothing to open.
Kept the draft after Maya's challenge
Final headline unchanged: “asdjflksdajflk;sadjf;lasjfkl;j”
#7 · #9 · #11
From app event log