Jada Okonkwo
A-3952Their final recommendation: “Profit fell $13M because of a longer Spring Sale, free shipping on online growth and a $4M one-off; not rent” · revised after Maya's challenge
Interview decision
Saved: Proceed · last review took 1m 41s. Click another to change it.
Review timer
Decided: Proceed
reviewed in 1m 41s · stopped
Digest · three moments, each linked to its time in the log
- no screenshot at this moment
- no screenshot at this moment
- no screenshot at this moment
Rubric · 4 dimensions · 1–10 · click for anchors and evidence
this candidate company baseline (avg of 2 sample employees) applicant median (n = 21)Review aid (demo rubric), not a hiring decision · scored by claude-opus-5 from the action log
Beside sample employees · same case
Sample employees| Jada Okonkwo | Associate ConsultantSample employee · 2nd year | Engagement ManagerSample employee · Manager | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem definition | 7 | 9 | 9 |
| Communication | 5 | 9 | 8 |
| AI verification | 6 | 9 | 9 |
| Adaptation | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| Checked the AI's claim | no | yes | yes |
| Asked the client finance analyst | yes | yes | yes |
| Revised after the challenge | yes | yes | yes |
| Time on the case | 3m 22s | 33m 20s | 21m 40s |
Two reference runs of the same case by sample employees, shown for context. Not a benchmark: no percentiles or predictions from two samples.
Evidence · open the exact exchange behind each claim
Asked Sam Ortiz a clarifying question
“What's the Q3 adjustment in the Marketing, G&A & other line?” · Sam shared a fact only they knew
#5
From app event log
Relied on the AI without checking
AI: “The main driver is store rent. Wrenfield's rent rose about 20% after lease renewals (≈ +$…” · no check against the docs or the analyst before the final.
#4
From app event log
Revised after Maya's challenge
Before: “Profit fell $13M because of a longer Spring Sale, free shipping on on…” → After: “Profit fell $13M because of a longer Spring Sale, free shipping on on…”
#9 · #10 · #11
From app event log