Calder & Finch · Strategy practice · Hiring manager: demo reviewer
Associate Consultant, workday simulation
Consulting case · simulated client workday · about 60 minutes ·client: Wrenfield Home
A 60-minute case simulation shortens the first case round (two one-hour interviews today). Later interviews and all decisions stay with people.
Hiring goal
3 Associate Consultants· 2 proceeding · 1 to go
2 of 3 filled by candidates you've marked Proceed
Rubric
Each behaviour is a row in every candidate's review, with the evidence behind it. Demo rubric; review aid, not a hiring decision.
| Behaviour | 1–3 | 4–7 | 8–10 |
|---|---|---|---|
Problem definition Finds the real question (profit, not revenue) and asks a specific clarification before analysing. | Never clarifies what the client prioritises; key finding misses the main drivers or blames rent. | Key finding broadly fits the docs, but the client's priority (margin this year vs growth) is assumed, not clarified. | Clarifies the client's priority with Maya or Helen, and gives a key finding that fits the docs (longer Spring Sale, free shipping on online growth, one-off). |
Communication Clear, professional replies to the EM and client; answer first, drivers in order. | No message to the client, or tells Helen 'it's rent'; recommendation unclear or incomplete. | Replies to Tom or Helen, but without clear next steps or a useful question; recommendation is serviceable. | A professional note to Tom or Helen confirming next steps with a useful question; a short, clear four-part recommendation. |
AI verification Checks the assistant's rent claim against the exhibits and explains the correction. | Repeats the assistant's (and the analyst's) ~20% rent figure without checking. | Uses the assistant and opens the financial summary, but never states the correction. | Cross-checks the assistant's summary against the financial summary (rent 30 → 31) and states the correction. |
Adaptation Revises the recommendation after the EM's new constraint, with a change note. | Ignores Maya's feedback or resubmits the draft unchanged. | Acknowledges the new constraint with minor changes; change note doesn't say why. | Reworks the action around the new constraint (4-week sale floor, Q3 shipping lock) and explains what changed and why. |